Call Now | (412) 981-2400
When a cancer diagnosis is delayed, the consequences can be life-threatening. Even a few months’ delay in diagnosing certain cancers can drastically reduce survival rates or limit the effectiveness of treatment options. In Pennsylvania, patients harmed by this kind of delay have a unique legal tool at their disposal: the “loss of chance” doctrine.
Unlike traditional malpractice laws that require proof that negligence directly caused death or injury, loss of chance acknowledges that patients can be harmed by losing a realistic opportunity for a better outcome—even if that outcome was never guaranteed. If a delay in diagnosis deprived you of a significant chance to beat or manage cancer, you may have a valid legal claim.
A Shift from Traditional Medical Malpractice Standards
Under conventional medical malpractice standards, plaintiffs must prove that a doctor’s negligence was the direct and primary cause of the injury or death. That typically means proving the odds were at least greater than 50% that the patient would have survived or recovered if proper care had been given.
However, this burden of proof made it virtually impossible for patients with serious conditions—like late-stage cancer—to hold doctors accountable unless they had extremely strong odds of recovery before the error occurred.
What Loss of Chance Recognizes
The loss of chance doctrine changes this by acknowledging that patients can be wronged even when they already had a poor prognosis. If a physician’s negligence decreased the statistical probability of a better outcome, the patient (or their family) can sue for damages corresponding to that percentage of lost opportunity.
For example, if you had a 45% chance of survival and that chance was reduced to 15% due to a missed diagnosis, you may be able to recover damages based on the 30% loss of chance—even though your original odds were under 50%.
How the Courts Interpret It
In Pennsylvania, courts have gradually evolved in their approach to loss of chance claims. Though initially met with resistance, recent rulings from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court have clarified that loss of chance is a legitimate cause of action—particularly in cancer misdiagnosis cases.
Today, Pennsylvania law permits these claims as long as the plaintiff can demonstrate that the physician’s negligence measurably reduced the patient’s chance of survival or successful treatment.
Cancer Misdiagnosis as a Leading Cause
Delayed or missed cancer diagnoses are among the most common situations where loss of chance is applied. Because cancer often progresses rapidly and early treatment significantly improves outcomes, even a short delay can result in measurable, detrimental changes in prognosis.
This doctrine is especially critical for cancers like breast, lung, colon, and melanoma, where a stage I diagnosis may be curable, but a stage III or IV diagnosis can be terminal.
Criteria for a Loss of Chance Claim
To bring a successful lawsuit under this doctrine, several criteria must be met:
Common Situations That Lead to Claims
You may have a valid legal claim if your cancer diagnosis was delayed due to:
Even if your prognosis was never certain, you can still sue if the delay substantially worsened your outcome.
What Is the Time Limit to File?
Under Pennsylvania law, the statute of limitations for medical malpractice lawsuits is typically two years from the date the injury occurred or from when the injury was (or reasonably should have been) discovered.
In cancer misdiagnosis cases, this means that the clock often starts ticking when the patient becomes aware that their cancer should have been diagnosed earlier.
Why Acting Quickly Is Critical
Failure to act within this timeframe may result in your case being dismissed, regardless of its merit. Given the complex and time-sensitive nature of gathering medical records and expert testimony, it’s crucial to speak to a malpractice attorney as soon as possible after you become aware of a delayed diagnosis.
The Role of Causation in Malpractice Law
In any medical malpractice case, you must prove that the provider’s negligence caused harm. In a traditional case, this means proving it was the direct cause of death or injury.
In a loss of chance case, however, you’re proving that the provider’s actions caused a statistical reduction in the probability of a favorable outcome.
The Importance of Expert Testimony
Pennsylvania courts require that you support your claim with expert medical testimony that meets the Daubert standard. This means your expert’s testimony must be:
Experts will often compare statistical survival rates from national cancer registries and medical literature to determine the difference between your expected outcome with a timely diagnosis and the actual outcome you experienced due to delay.
The most frequent errors that lead to loss of chance lawsuits include:
Each of these errors can lead to months of delay, during which cancer may metastasize, spread to vital organs, or become untreatable. The resulting loss of a curative or manageable treatment option becomes the central harm in a loss of chance claim.
What the Jury Considers
When a loss of chance claim goes to trial, jurors are instructed to consider:
An Example from the Courtroom
If it’s determined that a patient had a 60% chance of survival with timely diagnosis and only a 25% chance after the delay, jurors may award damages based on that 35% differential—not the entire value of a wrongful death or total loss.
Economic Damages
These include all financial losses associated with the worsened prognosis, such as:
Non-Economic Damages
These are harder to quantify but just as important:
Wrongful Death and Survival Actions
If the patient passes away, the family may file a wrongful death claim under the loss of chance doctrine. Pennsylvania law allows these damages to be calculated similarly, with a focus on the lost probability rather than absolute certainty.
Can I file a lawsuit even if my chances of survival were already low?
Yes, you can. One of the key principles of the “loss of chance” doctrine is that patients do not need to prove they would have survived or fully recovered if their cancer had been diagnosed earlier. Instead, you only need to show that a healthcare provider’s negligence reduced your chances of a better outcome—whether that means a longer life expectancy, more effective treatment, or a more manageable condition. Even if your odds were less than 50%, Pennsylvania law allows you to recover damages that reflect the percentage of opportunity you lost due to the delay.
How do I prove that a delayed cancer diagnosis caused me harm?
To prove harm in a loss of chance case, you must present medical evidence showing that your odds of survival or successful treatment would have been measurably better if your diagnosis had occurred earlier. This typically requires expert testimony from an oncologist or medical professional who can analyze your case, compare it to clinical standards, and apply survival statistics. Your medical records, pathology reports, and imaging studies will all play a role in constructing this timeline and proving that the delay led to a worse outcome.
Do I need an expert witness to win a loss of chance claim?
Yes, expert testimony is essential in loss of chance cases. Pennsylvania courts require that plaintiffs use qualified medical experts to explain both the standard of care that was violated and how that violation impacted the patient’s prognosis. The expert must also meet the Daubert standard, meaning their testimony must be based on scientifically sound methods and data. Without expert input, it is nearly impossible to meet the legal burden of proving causation and harm.
What if I only recently learned that my cancer should have been diagnosed earlier?
Pennsylvania law includes a “discovery rule,” which means the two-year statute of limitations for filing a malpractice claim begins when you either discover—or reasonably should have discovered—the negligence. If you only recently found out that your cancer was misdiagnosed or that your doctor ignored red flags months or years ago, the clock may start from the date you became aware of that information. However, there are exceptions and nuances, so it’s important to consult with a medical malpractice attorney as soon as possible to preserve your right to sue.
Can I sue on behalf of a loved one who died because of a delayed diagnosis?
Yes, you can. If your loved one passed away due to a delayed or missed cancer diagnosis, their estate may be eligible to file a wrongful death and/or survival action based on the loss of chance. These types of claims allow surviving family members to seek compensation for the reduced probability of survival caused by medical negligence. Damages may include medical expenses, lost income, emotional distress, and loss of companionship. A wrongful death attorney can help guide you through the process of filing on behalf of the deceased’s estate.
Cancer is devastating enough without knowing that your chance at beating it was taken away by preventable medical error. If you or someone you love received a delayed cancer diagnosis in Pennsylvania, you may be entitled to compensation through a loss of chance lawsuit.
These cases are legally and medically complex, but they can also be powerful tools for holding negligent providers accountable and securing the financial and emotional support patients and families deserve.
Don’t wait. Contact Matzus Law, LLC today to discuss your options. A short consultation could be the first step toward justice and healing.
Helping each and every one of our clients with tenacious representation when they need a strong and passionate advocate.
Maztus Law
Maztus Law