Call Now | (412) 981-2400
Medical malpractice cases in Pennsylvania are often complex and require the testimony of expert witnesses to explain technical medical details. These expert witnesses play a crucial role in determining whether a healthcare provider’s actions met the required standard of care or deviated from it. Their testimony can be the deciding factor in whether a plaintiff successfully proves negligence or a defendant effectively defends their actions.
This article explores the role of expert witnesses in Pennsylvania medical malpractice cases, the legal requirements they must meet, how they impact lawsuits, and what makes an expert witness credible in court. Whether you are a plaintiff, attorney, or medical professional, understanding these factors is essential when dealing with malpractice litigation.
An expert witness in a Pennsylvania medical malpractice lawsuit is a medical professional who provides specialized knowledge and testimony to help the court understand complex healthcare issues. Their primary role is to assess whether a physician or healthcare provider acted within the accepted standard of care and, if not, whether that deviation led to patient harm.
Responsibilities of an Expert Witness
Expert witnesses provide reports, depositions, and live courtroom testimony. They break down medical terms and procedures in a way that judges and juries—who typically lack medical training—can understand. Their analysis must be based on medical literature, established practices, and years of clinical experience. Courts rely heavily on their testimony because medical malpractice cases involve intricate details that require professional interpretation.
Pennsylvania’s Legal Requirements for Expert Witness Testimony
Pennsylvania law has specific criteria for determining who qualifies as an expert witness in medical malpractice cases. These requirements ensure that only credible and highly knowledgeable medical professionals testify in court.
The MCARE Act and Expert Witness Criteria
The Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error (MCARE) Act states that an expert witness must:
These requirements prevent testimony from doctors who lack direct experience in the area of medicine relevant to the case.
The Frye Standard and Expert Testimony
Pennsylvania follows the Frye Standard for expert testimony, which requires that an expert’s methods be widely accepted in the medical community. If an expert’s opinions or methodology are deemed too experimental or controversial, their testimony may not be admissible in court.
Expert witnesses serve several important functions in medical malpractice litigation. They establish the standard of care, determine whether a breach of that standard occurred, and prove causation—the direct link between a healthcare provider’s actions and the patient’s injury.
Establishing the Standard of Care
The standard of care refers to the level of skill, expertise, and diligence that a competent physician would have provided under the same circumstances. An expert witness assesses the actions of the defendant against these medical standards. If the defendant’s actions fell below the expected level of care, this constitutes a breach of duty.
Determining Breach of Duty
A court relies on expert testimony to determine whether the defendant deviated from accepted medical practices. For example, if a surgeon left a foreign object inside a patient during surgery, an expert witness would testify about how a competent surgeon would have prevented such an error.
Proving Causation
Proving causation is one of the most challenging aspects of medical malpractice litigation. Even if negligence is established, the plaintiff must show that this negligence directly caused their injury. An expert witness provides evidence linking the healthcare provider’s actions to the harm suffered by the patient. Without this testimony, the case may not hold up in court.
Testifying in Court
Expert witnesses play a key role in depositions and trial proceedings. They submit written reports that outline their professional opinion, answer questions under oath during pretrial depositions, and testify in front of a jury. They must be able to present complex medical concepts in a way that is clear, concise, and understandable to those without medical expertise.
Different types of expert witnesses are required depending on the nature of the medical malpractice case.
Standard of Care Experts
A standard of care expert is responsible for explaining what a competent physician would have done under the same circumstances. This type of expert is usually a practicing physician with direct experience in the relevant medical specialty. They analyze whether the defendant’s actions deviated from what is considered best practice.
Causation Experts
A causation expert is tasked with establishing a direct link between the physician’s actions and the patient’s injury. Even if a mistake occurred, it does not automatically mean that the mistake caused harm. Causation experts use medical records, test results, and established research to demonstrate that the defendant’s actions led to the plaintiff’s injury.
Economic Experts
In some cases, an economic expert may be called upon to determine the financial impact of the malpractice. These experts calculate medical expenses, lost wages, future care costs, and other damages to determine how much compensation a plaintiff may be entitled to.
Medical Specialists
Depending on the case, medical specialists may also be needed. For example, in a birth injury lawsuit, an obstetrician or neonatologist would serve as an expert witness. For cases involving surgical errors, an experienced surgeon would provide testimony. The selection of the right expert witness is critical to the strength of a malpractice case.
The credibility of an expert witness is one of the most important factors in a medical malpractice trial. Courts and juries evaluate various factors to determine whether an expert witness’s testimony should be trusted.
Relevant Experience
The expert must have current, real-world experience in the same specialty as the defendant. A board-certified expert in the same field as the defendant is more likely to be seen as credible.
Testimony History
The court also considers whether the expert witness has frequently testified in malpractice cases. If an expert is known for testifying in a large number of lawsuits, opposing counsel may argue that they are a “professional witness” rather than a practicing doctor.
Communication Skills
An expert witness must be able to explain complex medical topics in a way that is easy for a jury to understand. If their testimony is overly technical or difficult to follow, it may not be persuasive.
Opposing attorneys often challenge expert witness testimony to weaken the opposing party’s case.
1. Challenging Qualifications
One common challenge is questioning the expert’s qualifications, arguing that the witness does not have the appropriate background to testify on the matter.
2. Questioning Methodology
Attorneys may also challenge the expert’s methodology, arguing that their analysis is not based on accepted medical practices. If the expert’s methods are not widely recognized in the medical community, their testimony may be ruled inadmissible under the Frye Standard.
3. Exposing Bias
Bias is another area of attack. If an expert frequently testifies for one side—plaintiffs or defendants—the opposing counsel may argue that they are biased. This is why attorneys often seek witnesses with balanced professional backgrounds.
4. Contradicting Prior Testimony
Lastly, attorneys may attempt to contradict the expert witness by using their prior testimony against them. If an expert has testified differently in a past case, this can be used to undermine their credibility.
Is expert testimony required in all Pennsylvania medical malpractice cases?
Yes, Pennsylvania law mandates that medical malpractice cases must be supported by expert testimony. A qualified medical expert must testify that the healthcare provider in question deviated from the accepted standard of care and that this deviation directly caused the patient’s injury. Without expert testimony, most malpractice cases cannot proceed.
Can any doctor serve as an expert witness in Pennsylvania?
No, not all doctors can serve as expert witnesses in Pennsylvania medical malpractice cases. To qualify, the expert must be licensed, actively practicing, or teaching within the same medical specialty as the defendant. Additionally, they must have experience within the five years preceding the alleged malpractice incident. Their testimony must also be based on widely accepted medical practices.
How do lawyers choose an expert witness for a malpractice case?
Attorneys carefully select expert witnesses based on several factors, including their medical specialty, level of experience, board certification, and credibility in court. They also consider the expert’s history of testifying in malpractice cases, ensuring they have the ability to explain complex medical concepts in an understandable and persuasive manner.
Can a general practitioner testify as an expert in a malpractice case?
A general practitioner can serve as an expert witness only if the case involves general medical care within their expertise. However, if the case involves specialized treatment or procedures, a specialist in that particular medical field will be required to provide testimony.
How much does a medical expert witness charge?
Medical expert witness fees vary depending on their specialty, level of expertise, and the complexity of the case. They typically charge between $300 and $1,000 per hour for case reviews and consultations. Depositions may cost between $2,000 and $5,000, while testifying in court can range from $5,000 to $10,000 per day. Costs may increase for highly specialized experts or those with significant courtroom experience.
Expert witnesses are essential in Pennsylvania medical malpractice litigation. They clarify complex medical facts, establish whether a physician acted negligently, and prove causation. Their testimony can determine the outcome of a lawsuit, making their selection a critical step in any malpractice case.
If you are dealing with a medical malpractice claim in Pennsylvania, it is crucial to have the right legal team and expert witness on your side. Consulting with an experienced medical malpractice attorney can help you find the best expert to support your case.
If you believe you have been a victim of medical negligence, do not hesitate to seek legal assistance. Contact Matzus Law, LLC today to discuss your case and protect your legal rights.
Helping each and every one of our clients with tenacious representation when they need a strong and passionate advocate.
Maztus Law
Maztus Law