3 Common Misconceptions About Medical Malpractice Cases

April 24, 2024

Medical malpractice is a complex field of law that often gets misrepresented in public discourse. Many people harbor misconceptions about what constitutes malpractice, how the legal process works, and the outcomes of such cases. These misunderstandings can deter injured patients from seeking the justice and compensation they rightfully deserve. It’s essential to clear up these misconceptions to ensure that patients are fully informed about their rights and the realities of pursuing medical malpractice claims.

In this article, we will address three common misconceptions about medical malpractice cases. By dispelling these myths, we aim to provide clarity and support to those who may be hesitant to take legal action due to a lack of understanding or fear of the unknown. Understanding the truth behind these misconceptions not only helps potential clients make informed decisions but also sheds light on the intricacies of medical malpractice litigation.

3 Common Misconceptions About Medical Malpractice Cases

Misconception 1: Medical Malpractice Claims Are Easy Money

One of the most persistent myths surrounding medical malpractice cases is the belief that they are a quick and easy way to gain financial compensation. This misconception stems from high-profile cases with large settlements that frequently make headlines, but these are not reflective of the average malpractice claim. Here’s why this belief does not hold up under scrutiny:

Complexity of Proving Malpractice

  • Establishing Negligence: To succeed in a medical malpractice claim, a plaintiff must demonstrate that a healthcare provider failed to meet the standard of care that a reasonably competent provider would have offered under similar circumstances. This involves detailed medical knowledge and expert testimony, which can be difficult and costly to obtain.
  • Linking Harm to Negligence: Even if negligence is established, plaintiffs must also prove that this directly caused their injury. This causation element often requires intricate medical evidence and can be one of the most challenging aspects of a malpractice case.

Time-Consuming and Costly Legal Processes

  • Duration of Cases: Medical malpractice lawsuits can take years to resolve, during which time plaintiffs might face significant personal and financial strain.
  • Legal and Expert Costs: The cost of pursuing a medical malpractice claim can be prohibitive, as it often requires the involvement of multiple medical experts, as well as specialized legal representation.

Uncertain Outcomes

  • No Guaranteed Settlements: While some cases may settle out of court, there is no guarantee of a settlement, and some cases may result in no compensation at all, especially if the court finds that the standard of care was met or the harm was not directly caused by the provider’s actions.

Impact on Recovery

  • Emotional and Physical Toll: The process of undergoing a prolonged legal battle can have significant emotional and physical impacts on plaintiffs, compounding the stress of their existing medical issues.

The reality is that medical malpractice claims are far from a guaranteed or easy source of money. They require a considerable investment of time, resources, and emotional energy, with no certain outcome.

Misconception 2: Any Unfavorable Medical Outcome is Grounds for Malpractice

A common misunderstanding is that any unfavorable outcome from a medical procedure or treatment automatically qualifies as medical malpractice. This is far from the truth, and understanding the distinction is crucial for both patients and healthcare providers.

Differentiating Unfavorable Outcomes from Malpractice

  • Nature of Medical Treatments: Medical procedures inherently carry risks, and not all adverse outcomes are due to negligence. Many medical treatments have known potential side effects or complications that can occur without any error on the part of healthcare providers.
  • Informed Consent: Prior to undergoing any significant medical treatment, patients are typically required to give informed consent, which includes an acknowledgment of the risks involved. An outcome that falls within these known risks, even if it is negative, is not considered malpractice.

Criteria for Malpractice

  • Breach of Standard of Care: For a medical outcome to be considered malpractice, there must be a breach of the standard of care. This means that the healthcare provider acted in a way that a competent professional would not have under similar circumstances.
  • Direct Causation: There must be a direct link between the provider’s breach and the injury suffered. If an unfavorable outcome happens but is not directly caused by a provider’s action or omission, it does not constitute malpractice.

Examples to Illustrate Non-Malpractice Situations

  • Complications: A patient may develop a complication such as an infection after surgery, despite the surgeon performing the operation correctly and following all protocols.
  • Progressive Conditions: A patient’s condition may deteriorate due to the natural progression of a disease or condition, rather than any specific treatment or lack thereof.

Understanding that not all unfavorable medical outcomes are due to negligence is essential. This knowledge helps set realistic expectations for patients considering legal action and underscores the importance of expert legal guidance to discern legitimate malpractice cases.

Misconception 3: Filing a Medical Malpractice Claim Always Leads to Court

Many people believe that initiating a medical malpractice claim inevitably results in a lengthy and public court battle. However, this is not always the case. Understanding the various paths a malpractice claim can take helps demystify the process and reduce anxiety for potential plaintiffs.

Settlements Are Common

  • Pre-trial Settlements: The majority of medical malpractice cases are resolved through settlements before they reach trial. Settlements are mutually agreed upon by both parties, often with the guidance of legal counsel, and can provide a more predictable outcome than a trial.
  • Advantages of Settlements: Settlements can be less stressful for the plaintiff, typically require less time than going to trial, and are private, which can be important for both the patient and the healthcare provider involved.

Mediation and Arbitration

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR): Besides court trials, mediation and arbitration are increasingly common methods of resolving disputes in medical malpractice claims. These methods are usually quicker, cheaper, and less adversarial than traditional court proceedings.
  • Role of Mediators and Arbitrators: These neutral third parties help facilitate a resolution that is acceptable to all involved parties, often leading to solutions that are more tailored to the specific needs and interests of both sides.

Going to Trial

  • When Cases Go to Trial: While it’s true that some medical malpractice claims do go to trial, this usually happens when the parties cannot agree on the facts of the case, the extent of the damages, or when the defendant believes they have a strong defense against the claim.
  • Thorough Preparation: For cases that do go to trial, having a skilled legal team like Matzus Law, LLC is crucial. They prepare meticulously, representing the client’s interests vigorously to achieve the best possible outcome.

Support Through Legal Expertise

  • Guidance from Experienced Attorneys: Navigating whether to settle or proceed to trial is a critical decision. Legal experts can provide invaluable advice based on an assessment of the case’s strengths and weaknesses, the likelihood of a favorable outcome, and the personal circumstances of the client.

This misconception overlooks the varied and often conciliatory ways that medical malpractice issues are commonly resolved. It is important for potential plaintiffs to understand that they have options that do not necessarily involve enduring the stresses of a trial.

Contact Matzus Law, LLC Today

In Pittsburgh, navigating the complex landscape of medical malpractice claims demands expertise and dedication. Matzus Law, LLC stands as a beacon of support for victims of medical negligence. Our seasoned team of lawyers specializes in unraveling the intricate details of medical malpractice cases, ensuring that justice is served. 

With a deep understanding of Pennsylvania’s medical laws and a relentless commitment to our clients, we advocate tirelessly to secure the compensation and care our clients deserve. Whether you’ve suffered due to a surgical error, misdiagnosis, or any other form of medical negligence, Matzus Law, LLC is here to guide you through every step of your legal journey, providing clarity and support when you need it most.  Contact Matzus Law, LLC today for a free, no-obligation consultation, or call us at (412) 206-5300 to talk with our legal team to learn more about your options in your case.  


He’s Brilliant.
Jason Matzus is a Lawyer —
You Thank God is on Your Side.



Case Results

Medical Malpractice
Confidential Settlement
Birth Injury
Confidential Settlement
Surgical Error
Confidential Settlement