Possible Reasons Why a Physician Would be Sued for Malpractice?

April 13, 2024

Medical malpractice is a significantly complex area of law, particularly in Pennsylvania where the stakes for healthcare providers and patients alike are exceedingly high. At its core, medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare professional deviates from the standards of their profession, leading to patient injury or death. Understanding these standards, and the common breaches thereof is crucial for both protecting patient rights and guiding physicians through the maze of legal obligations they face.

The pursuit of a malpractice claim hinges on proving that a physician’s actions were not only erroneous but fell below the accepted medical standard of care. This can encompass a range of errors, from misdiagnosis to procedural mistakes. Each case provides a poignant reminder of the delicate balance healthcare providers must maintain between risk management and patient care.

At Matzus Law, LLC, we specialize in medical malpractice in Pennsylvania and emphasize the importance of recognizing these pivotal moments in healthcare that lead to litigation. It is essential for patients to understand their rights and for medical professionals to comprehend the legal implications of their practices. 

Failure to Diagnose or Misdiagnosis

Misdiagnosis or failure to diagnose an illness correctly is one of the most common grounds for medical malpractice claims against physicians. Such errors can lead to a lack of necessary medical treatment, delay in the correct treatment, or inappropriate (and sometimes harmful) treatment being administered, all of which can severely worsen a patient’s condition.

The Critical Impact of Diagnostic Errors

Diagnostic errors can be particularly perilous. For instance, a delayed diagnosis of cancer can mean the difference between a treatment that could lead to remission and one that merely aims to prolong life or ease pain. Similarly, misdiagnosing a heart attack as a panic attack can lead to catastrophic health outcomes. In Pennsylvania, the law requires proving that a competent doctor in a similar field would not have made the same diagnostic error under comparable circumstances.

Legal Perspectives on Diagnostic Negligence

From a legal standpoint, establishing a misdiagnosis case typically involves demonstrating that a doctor-patient relationship existed, the doctor failed to provide the standard level of care expected, and this failure directly caused the patient’s harm. Matzus Law, LLC specializes in dissecting these complex interactions, helping to pinpoint where the standard of care was breached and the specific damages that ensued.

Preventive Measures and Physician Responsibilities

To mitigate the risks of misdiagnosis, medical professionals must adhere to stringent diagnostic protocols and continually update their knowledge base with the latest medical advancements and guidelines. Effective communication with patients, thorough examination procedures, and the prudent use of diagnostic tests are critical factors in reducing diagnostic errors.

Healthcare systems also play a significant role in supporting physicians by providing access to second opinions and fostering an environment where consultation and careful review of patient symptoms and tests are standard practice. These institutional supports can be crucial in preventing misdiagnosis and ensuring high standards of patient care.

Surgical Errors

Surgical errors represent a grave area of concern within medical malpractice, with repercussions that can be severe and life-altering for patients. These errors are preventable mistakes that occur during surgery, which should not happen if the medical standards of care are followed.

Types of Surgical Errors

Common surgical mistakes include operating on the wrong body part, performing the incorrect procedure, or leaving surgical instruments inside the patient’s body. Other errors may involve nerve damage during the procedure, incorrect incision locations, or infections caused by non-sterile techniques. Each of these errors can result in significant patient harm and are viewed severely under the law.

Legal Accountability for Surgical Mistakes

In Pennsylvania, the law requires that patients demonstrate that a surgeon failed to adhere to a recognized standard of care during surgery to claim malpractice. This involves showing that most competent surgeons would have acted differently under the same circumstances. Legal experts often rely on medical records, expert testimonies, and other evidence to substantiate claims of surgical negligence.

Impact on Patients and Healthcare Providers

The impact of surgical errors can extend beyond physical harm, including severe emotional and financial distress. For healthcare providers, these incidents can lead to loss of reputation, licensure issues, and increased insurance premiums. Preventing such errors involves rigorous surgical planning, adherence to safety protocols, and continuous medical education.

Prevention and Safety Measures

To prevent surgical errors, hospitals and surgical centers must implement and adhere to comprehensive checklists, ensure team communication, and conduct preoperative planning meticulously. Utilizing technology such as surgical sponges with RFID tags can also help prevent leaving items in the patient’s body—a common surgical mistake.

Improper Treatment

Improper treatment refers to instances where a physician’s chosen method of care deviates from the accepted medical standards, potentially leading to patient harm. This form of malpractice can occur in various scenarios, including administering an inappropriate treatment for a patient’s condition or failing to administer treatment correctly.

Varieties of Improper Treatment

Improper treatment can range from using outdated techniques, ignoring established clinical guidelines, or choosing an unconventional treatment path that is not supported by the medical community. For example, using a medication known to be ineffective for a condition or failing to provide a necessary surgical intervention when indicated can have detrimental effects on patient health.

Legal Framework and Patient Rights

Under Pennsylvania law, proving improper treatment involves demonstrating that a competent healthcare provider would not have chosen the same course of action under similar circumstances. Patients and their legal representatives must show that this departure from standard care directly resulted in harm. This often requires expert testimony to establish what the standard care should have been and how the provider’s actions deviated from that standard.

Consequences for Patients and Healthcare Systems

The consequences of improper treatment are profound, affecting not only the physical and emotional health of patients but also the credibility and operational standing of healthcare facilities. Patients may suffer from worsened health outcomes, including prolonged recovery times, increased medical costs, and permanent disability.

Strategies for Prevention

Preventing improper treatment involves continuous education and training for healthcare providers, adherence to clinical guidelines, and a robust system for reviewing and updating treatment protocols. Healthcare institutions should also encourage a culture of openness where medical professionals feel empowered to discuss and refine treatment approaches.

Medication Mistakes

Medication errors are among the most common causes of medical malpractice claims. These mistakes can occur at any stage of the medication process, from prescribing to dispensing, and have the potential to cause severe patient harm.

Types of Medication Errors

Medication errors can include prescribing the wrong drug, dispensing the wrong dosage, failing to account for patient allergies or interactions with other medications, and errors in the way medications are administered. For example, an overdose of a powerful anticoagulant can lead to life-threatening bleeding, while underdosing an antibiotic can result in untreated infections and resistance.

Legal Considerations in Medication Error Cases

In Pennsylvania, patients who suffer harm due to medication errors may have grounds for a malpractice lawsuit if they can demonstrate that the error deviated from the standard of care typically expected in similar situations. This often involves gathering expert testimonies and medical records to build a compelling case.

Impact on Patients

The consequences of medication errors can be devastating, including permanent health impairment, additional medical treatments, and in severe cases, death. The emotional and financial toll on affected patients and their families can also be significant.

Preventing Medication Errors

Preventing these errors requires careful coordination among the healthcare team, the use of technology for cross-checking patient data and prescriptions, and stringent protocols for medication administration. Continuous education on drug interactions, side effects, and proper dosage calculations is crucial for healthcare providers.

Failure to Warn a Patient of Known Risks (Informed Consent)

Informed consent is a fundamental principle in healthcare, requiring that patients be made aware of potential risks and outcomes associated with any medical procedure or treatment before it is performed. Failure to obtain informed consent can be a significant basis for medical malpractice lawsuits.

Importance of Informed Consent

Informed consent involves more than just getting a patient to sign a form; it is about ensuring that they truly understand the potential risks, benefits, and alternatives available to them. This process is crucial for patient autonomy and allows them to make educated decisions about their healthcare.

Legal Requirements for Informed Consent

Under Pennsylvania law, healthcare providers are obligated to provide patients with sufficient information about the significant risks and viable alternatives of a proposed treatment. The failure to do so can lead to claims of medical malpractice if the patient suffers harm that they would have avoided had they been properly informed.

Strategies to Enhance Informed Consent Practices

To prevent issues related to informed consent, healthcare providers should adopt practices that ensure information is delivered in a clear, comprehensible manner. This might include using visual aids, simplified language, and interactive consent forms. Additionally, allowing time for patients to ask questions and consider their options is essential.

Contact Matzus Law, LLC Today

Medical malpractice remains a critical concern in Pennsylvania, with significant implications for both patients and healthcare providers. This article has outlined several common reasons physicians might be sued for malpractice, including failure to diagnose or misdiagnose, surgical errors, improper treatment, medication mistakes, and failure to provide informed consent. Each of these areas highlights the complex interplay between medical practice standards, patient safety, and legal accountability.

For patients, understanding these potential issues is crucial for advocating for their own health and ensuring they receive the care they deserve. For healthcare providers, awareness and adherence to medical standards, combined with a commitment to continuous improvement and patient communication, are essential to minimize the risk of facing malpractice lawsuits.

At Matzus Law, LLC, we specialize in representing clients affected by medical malpractice, providing them with the legal support needed to navigate these challenging situations. If you believe you have been a victim of medical malpractice, it is important to seek knowledgeable legal counsel to understand your rights and the possible courses of action. Contact Matzus Law, LLC today for a free, no-obligation consultation, or call us at (412) 206-5300 to talk with our legal team to learn more about your options in your case.  


He’s Brilliant.
Jason Matzus is a Lawyer —
You Thank God is on Your Side.



Case Results

Medical Malpractice
Confidential Settlement
Birth Injury
Confidential Settlement
Surgical Error
Confidential Settlement