Call Now | (412) 206-5300
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has decided to reexamine one case’s acceptance of evidence in a recent medical malpractice lawsuit. The original case alleged that a doctor was negligent during the victim’s hysterectomy and that he accidentally severed her bowel during the surgery in 2013. At trial, the judge allowed the defense to explain to the jury the general risks associated with routine hysterectomies. The jury ultimately found that the doctor was not guilty of negligence.
A Superior Court later decided to order a new trial based on the trial judge’s acceptance of evidence surrounding the potential complications of hysterectomies. The Superior Court panel was concerned that such evidence may have influenced the jury in favor of the doctor. Such evidence, the panel argued, should not be relevant in medical negligence cases. The panel also agreed that information concerning the surgical risks of hysterectomies should only be admitted when questioning whether the patient had given informed consent to treatment or when establishing a standard of care.
The Superior Court’s ruling, according to the defendants, conflicts with an earlier Supreme Court decision which allows information regarding known risks into evidence as it relates to the standard of care in specific medical procedures. Such evidence, the defense argues, can help jury members understand the potential for complications in the absence of negligent behavior. The Supreme Court has agreed to hear both arguments and make an official ruling on this matter.
As experienced medical malpractice attorneys, the legal professionals at Matzus Law, LLC have spent 20 years representing clients injured by doctors. We are prepared to handle complex medical cases, and we are ready to help you and your family understand your legal rights, argue your case to a jury, and pursue financial compensation for your injuries. The attorneys at Matzus Law, LLC can be reached at (412) 206-5300.
The articles on this blog are for informative purposes only and are no substitute for legal advice or an attorney-client relationship. If you are seeking legal advice, please contact our law firm directly.
Helping each and every one of our clients with tenacious representation when they need a strong and passionate advocate.